Landmark Paris trial of Syrian officials accused of torturing, killing a father and his son starts

PARIS (AP) — The landmark trial of three former Syrian intelligence officials began Tuesday at a Paris court for the alleged torture and killing of a French-Syrian father and son who were arrested over a decade ago, during the height of Arab Spring-inspired anti-government protests.

International warrants have been issued for the defendants, who are being tried in absentia.

The father, Mazen Dabbagh, and his son, Patrick, were arrested in the Syrian capital, Damascus, in 2013, following a crackdown on demonstrations that later turned into a brutal civil war, now in its 14th year. The probe into their disappearance started in 2015 when Obeida Dabbagh, Mazen’s brother, testified to investigators already examining war crimes in Syria.

The four-day hearings come as Syria’s President Bashar Assad has started to shed his longtime status as a pariah that stemmed from the violence unleashed on his opponents. Human rights groups involved in the case hope it will refocus attention on alleged atrocities.

About 50 activists gathered near the Paris Criminal Court, chanting for “freedom” and in support of the disappeared and the dead.

READ MORE US Open champ Coco Gauff calls on young Americans to get out and vote. ‘Use the power that we have’ Macron is making a surprise trip to New Caledonia amid deadly unrest and indigenous frustration France is trying Syrian ex-officials for the torture and killing of a father and son. Here’s why

Arwad, a young Syrian girl who has lived in France since 2018, was not at the hearing but joined the rally. “We are refugees, we support freedom,” she said.

If the three — Ali Mamlouk, former head of the National Security Bureau; Jamil Hassan, former air force intelligence director; and Abdel Salam Mahmoud, former head of investigations for the service in Damascus — are convicted, they could be sentenced to life in prison in France. They are the most senior Syrian officials to go on trial in a European court over crimes allegedly committed during the country’s civil war

The first hearing Tuesday invited several witnesses, including Ziad Majed, a Franco-Lebanese academic specializing in Syria, to provide “context testimonies” in front of three judges. Majed shed light on the history of the Assad family’s rule since the early 1970s. He later joined the demonstrators, calling for justice for the disappeared.

Garance Le Caisne, author and writer, and François Burgat, a scholar of Islam, also testified. Both are experts on Syrian matters.

Le Caisne said: “Torture is not to make people talk but to silence them. The regime is very structured. Arrests are arbitrary. You disappear. You can go buy bread or meat and not return home.” He added that Assad in 2011 after nationwide anti-government protests broke out “thought he was losing power and repressed the protesters unimaginably” and that now his government had ”complete control over the population.”

The Dabbagh family lawyer, Clemence Bectarte, from the International Federation for Human Rights, told The Associated Press she had high hopes for the trial.

“This trial represents immense hope for all Syrian victims who cannot attain justice. Impunity continues to reign in Syria, so this trial aims to bring justice to the family and echo the stories of hundreds of thousands of Syrian victims,” Bectarte said.

The brother, Obeida, and his wife, Hanane, are set to testify on Thursday, the third day of the trial. “I hope the responsible parties will be condemned. This could set a precedent for holding Assad accountable,” he told the AP. “Hundreds of thousands of Syrians have died. Even today, some live in fear and terror.”

Obeida and Hanane, as well as non-governmental organizations, are parties to the trial.

“We are always afraid,” he said. “Since I started talking about this case, as soon as my brother and nephew disappeared, the motivation to see a trial took over. The fear disappeared. I am now relieved that this pain and suffering are leading to something.”

Brigitte Herremans, a senior researcher at the Human Rights Centre of Ghent University, emphasized the trial’s significance despite the defendants’ absence. “It’s very important that perpetrators from the regime side are held accountable, even if it’s mainly symbolic. It means a lot for the fight against impunity,” Herremans said.

The verdict is expected Friday.

__

Oleg Cetinic contributed to this report.